RAGING Backlash: Trans Win Overturned After Viral Protest

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s investigation into a women’s weightlifting event—after a biological male was crowned champion—has reignited the national battle to protect the integrity of women’s sports from radical gender policies.

Story Snapshot

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched a formal investigation into the World’s Strongest Woman competition following the initial victory of a transgender athlete.
Athlete Jammie Booker, a biological male identifying as female, was disqualified, and the runner-up, Andrea Thompson, was reinstated as champion following public protest.
The state’s action highlights a growing regulatory pushback against policies allowing biological males in female athletic competitions.
The competition organizer has revised its eligibility rules to require participation based on sex assigned at birth, signaling a major policy shift.

Paxton Launches Investigation After Controversial Competition Outcome

On November 25, 2025, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a formal investigation into the 2025 World’s Strongest Woman competition, which was held in Arlington, Texas. The investigation was prompted after Jammie Booker, a biological male who identifies as female, was initially declared the winner of the competition. The outcome immediately sparked controversy, raising concerns about fairness in women’s sports.

The runner-up, Andrea Thompson, publicly refused to stand on the podium, triggering a visible public backlash. The organization responsible for the competition, Official Strongman, subsequently disqualified Booker, citing a failure to properly disclose or meet biological sex requirements during registration, and reinstated Thompson as the champion.

🚨 BREAKING: AG Ken Paxton launches INVESTIGATION into the competition where a transgender biological male WON "World's Strongest Woman" in Arlington, Texas

2nd place competitor Andrea Thompson had her place STOLEN by a man.

Luckily, the man named Jammie Booker was STRIPPED of… pic.twitter.com/2pkczW3KyF

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 25, 2025

Policy Shifts and State-Level Action on Eligibility

The investigation by the Texas AG’s office marks a decisive escalation in state intervention in athletic governance. Paxton’s inquiry is framed as a defense of the “integrity of girls’ sports”, aligning with a broader political movement focused on maintaining competitive categories based on biological sex. In the aftermath of the event, Official Strongman revised its eligibility rules, now explicitly mandating that all competitors participate in the category matching their sex assigned at birth.

This incident is part of an ongoing trend where states, led by Texas, have taken legal action against sports organizations over transgender athlete participation, reflecting a policy position that prioritizes biological differences in athletic competition.

Backlash Against Inclusion Policies and the Push for Fairness

The controversy has deepened the national debate over transgender athlete inclusion in sports. Advocacy groups like the Independent Council on Women’s Sports (ICONS) and female athletes, including Thompson, have been vocal in their demand for sex-based eligibility rules, arguing that physical differences between biological males and females cannot be eliminated by self-identification. Champions who have publicly supported this stance include Rebecca Roberts and Mitchell Hooper.

The Texas AG’s investigation is widely viewed as a test case for future legislative and legal battles at both the state and federal levels regarding the definition of sex in sports. The outcome is expected to influence athletic policies across the country.

Ongoing Investigation and Broader Implications for American Sports

The official findings of Attorney General Paxton’s probe remain pending. Event organizers nationwide are reviewing their eligibility rules and policies on gender equity to mitigate potential legal and reputational risks.

The case exemplifies the continuing policy conflict between the principle of inclusion and the protection of competitive equity in women’s athletics. The outcome of the investigation may set legal precedents that shape how future sports policies are written and enforced across the U.S.